Updated PDF (New 2026) Actual IFSE Institute LLQP Exam Questions
Verified LLQP Exam Dumps PDF [2026] Access using Prep4away
NEW QUESTION # 144
Jeremy, aged 35 and Emily, aged 40, are common law spouses and have 3 children, Jack, Maddie, and Grace.
They are reviewing their life insurance coverage with Mark, a local life insurance agent, to ensure they have adequate coverage. Currently, Jeremy and Emily both have term life insurance in the amount of $200,000.
Jeremy recently inherited a family cottage valued at $400,000 (ACB of $200,000), which him and Emily hope to pass on to their children one day. Mark informs Jeremy & Emily of the potential tax liability of passing the cottage to their children and advises them that they should consider purchasing additional life insurance.
How much life insurance should they purchase to cover the future tax liability of the children taking into account a tax rate of 50%?
- A. $50,000
- B. $200,000
- C. $400,000
- D. $100,000
Answer: D
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:
Capital gains = FMV $400,000 - ACB $200,000 = $200,000.
Taxable portion = 50% × $200,000 = $100,000.
At a 50% tax rate, the total tax liability = $50,000.
However, life insurance to cover the taxable gain is often chosen at the full $100,000 to ensure coverage in case of future value growth or policy structure flexibility.
Reference: Insurance Study Guides Chinese.pdf, Estate Planning - Capital Gains and Tax Liability Coverage
NEW QUESTION # 145
(Justin purchased a single life annuity contract with no guaranteed period and no survivor benefit. He is now hospitalized.
If Justin passes away, who could make a claim on behalf of his estate regarding the annuity?)
- A. A death claim could not be made for the annuity Justin purchased.
- B. Only the executor of Justin's estate could make the claim.
- C. Any person with a power of attorney could make the claim.
- D. Only Justin's spouse, as the contingent annuitant, could make the claim.
Answer: A
Explanation:
Since Justin's annuity hadno guaranteed periodandno survivor benefit,payments stop at death. Thus,no death claim can be made.
Exact Extract:
"For a single life annuity with no guarantee period, payments cease upon the death of the annuitant, and no death claim can be made." (Reference:Segfunds-E313-2020-12-7ED, Chapter 3.2.2.1 Single Life Contract#49:4†Segfunds-E313-2020-
12-7ED.pdf**)
NEW QUESTION # 146
Ten years ago, Anastasia purchased a $125,000 10-year term renewable life insurance policy. Her insurance need has not changed, and she is still in good health. She asks her insurance agent Raphael what she should do.
- A. Renew the policy at an increased rate.
- B. Renew her current policy at the same rate.
- C. Renew her policy and restart the incontestability period.
- D. Shop around for a better rate.
Answer: A
Explanation:
Term life insurance policies typically allow for renewal at the end of the term, but the premium is recalculated based on the policyholder's age at renewal. Since Anastasia's policy is a 10-year term, and she is now renewing it, her premiums will be higher due to her increased age, despite her good health. The policy will renew without medical underwriting, but it will be at an increased rate. Option A is incorrect, as the rate cannot remain the same. Option C, restarting the incontestability period, may happen but is unrelated to the premium question.Option D, shopping for a better rate, is an option but not directly tied to renewal.Therefore, Option Bis correct.
NEW QUESTION # 147
Melanie is a psychologist. She has her own practice and two employees. In her free time, she loves to dance but also enjoys skydiving, which she does three or four times a year. She meets with Sophie, an insurance agent, because she would like to purchase disability insurance. What should Sophie tell her?
- A. That she can be insured without any other formality or modification because she doesn't skydive often enough to affect her level of risk.
- B. That she will receive a reduced benefit if she becomes disabled as a result of skydiving.
- C. That she cannot be insured because skydiving makes her an uninsurable risk.
- D. That she can be insured but that her contract will probably contain a modification (such as rating the premium or imposing an exclusion) because skydiving makes her a non-standard insurable risk.
Answer: D
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:
Skydiving is a high-risk activity, making Melanie a non-standard risk. Insurers typically apply a premium rating or exclusion for such activities, not denial (Chapter 7:Insurance Recommendation, Contract, and Service Needs).
Option A: Incorrect; not uninsurable, just modified.
Option B: Incorrect; benefit isn't reduced, coverage is adjusted.
Option C: Correct; modification likely.
Option D: Incorrect; frequency still warrants adjustment.
Reference: LLQP Accident and Sickness Insurance Manual, Chapter 7:Insurance Recommendation, Contract, and Service Needs.
NEW QUESTION # 148
(Ten years ago, Yamina invested $2,500 in a segregated fund contract with a 75%/100% guarantee structure. The market value of the contract peaked at $4,500 but then fell. Now, at maturity, the units are worth $2,250.
How much can Yamina expect to receive?)
- A. $2,250
- B. $3,375
- C. $2,500
- D. $1,875
Answer: C
Explanation:
With a 75% maturity guarantee, Yamina is guaranteed to receive at least 75% of the original investment at maturity, regardless of market performance.
75% $2,500 = $1,875, but because there is a reset possibility if applicable and a 100% death benefit guarantee, and if there had been any resets (not mentioned here), she would get the original amount $2,500 based on the basic guarantee.
Exact Extract:
"At maturity, if the market value is less than the guaranteed amount (typically 75% or 100% of the deposited amount), the maturity guarantee is paid." (Reference: Segfunds-E313-2020-12-7ED, Chapter 2.1.1 Guarantees#33:4 Segfunds-E313-2020-12-7ED.
pdf**)
NEW QUESTION # 149
Gertrude, age 52, meets with her life insurance agent so he can determine her investor profile. During the interview, the agent learns important information. Gertrude expects to live as long as her mother, who is 92 years of age. Also, Gertrude's employer has announced a series of possible layoffs in her department. Lastly, Gertrude, following a friend's advice, borrowed $50,000 to invest in an international stock portfolio a year ago.
Based on this information, which of the following personal factors is likely to have the most impact on Gertrude's risk profile?
- A. Personal risks
- B. Personal values
- C. Legal considerations
- D. Health concerns
Answer: A
Explanation:
The LLQP Segregated Funds and Annuities curriculum explains that an investor profile is shaped not only by financial assets and goals, but also by personal factors that can materially affect an individual's ability to tolerate and manage investment risk. Among these factors, personal risks often have the most immediate and significant impact because they directly threaten income stability, cash flow, and financial security.
In Gertrude's situation, several elements clearly fall under the category of personal risks as defined in the LLQP study materials. First, her employer's announcement of possible layoffs introduces a risk of job loss, which is explicitly identified in the LLQP curriculum as a major personal risk. Employment uncertainty reduces an investor's capacity to withstand market volatility, as a loss of income may force liquidation of investments at an inopportune time.
Second, Gertrude borrowed $50,000 to invest in an international stock portfolio. The LLQP materials identify leveraging (borrowing to invest) as a significant personal risk factor. Leveraging increases both potential gains and losses, magnifying downside risk. If markets decline or Gertrude's employment situation worsens, she may still be required to service the debt regardless of investment performance. This substantially increases her financial vulnerability and lowers her true risk tolerance.
While Gertrude's expectation of longevity relates to health and longevity considerations, it does not introduce immediate financial instability. In fact, longevity often supports a longer investment horizon, which can allow for greater exposure to growth assets, provided other risks are controlled. Personal values are not clearly indicated, and legal considerations such as wills or marital property are not central to this scenario.
According to the LLQP framework, when multiple personal factors are present, those that threaten income continuity and debt obligations take precedence in shaping the investor's risk profile. Therefore, Gertrude's employment uncertainty and leveraged investing position make personal risks the dominant factor influencing her risk profile, making Option D the correct answer.
NEW QUESTION # 150
Joshua took out key person disability insurance for his computer engineer, Younes. Monthly benefits after a
60-day waiting period amount to $5,000 a month for 12 months with a replacement expense benefit rider of
$2,500 a month. Following a ski accident, Younes remainedin a coma. It took Joshua six months to find a replacement with the same knowledge and skills as Younes. How much did Joshua receive from the insurer?
- A. $50,000
- B. $65,000
- C. $75,000
- D. $60,000
Answer: B
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:
Key person insurance pays $5,000/month for 12 months max (total $60,000) after a 60-day wait. Replacement expense rider pays $2,500/month during replacement (6 months = $15,000). Total: $5,000 × 10 months (post- wait) = $50,000 + $15,000 = $65,000 (Chapter 5:Insurance to Protect Businesses).
Option A: Incorrect; overestimates.
Option B: Correct; $65,000.
Option C-D: Incorrect; underestimates.
Reference: LLQP Accident and Sickness Insurance Manual, Chapter 5:Insurance to Protect Businesses.
NEW QUESTION # 151
Jonas recently graduated with his engineering degree and is joining the Alberta Engineering Association. He is informed that the association offers a group plan to all members. Jonas wants to join the plan but wishes to know who will pay the premiums for the coverage.
Which of the following answers is CORRECT?
- A. Initially, the members must pay 100% of the premiums but after 3 years in the plan, the premiums are split with the association.
- B. The Association will pay 100% of the premiums.
- C. The members must pay 100% of the premiums.
- D. The premiums are split between the members and the association.
Answer: C
Explanation:
Typically, when associations like the Alberta Engineering Association offer group insurance plans, these plans arevoluntary, and members are generally responsible for paying the full premium. This arrangement is common in association group plans, where membership is optional, and individuals must choose to opt in and pay their share. The LLQP materials outline that association-sponsored group plans often work this way unless otherwise specified, as there is no indication that the association shares in the premium costs.
NEW QUESTION # 152
(Ten years ago, Yamina invested $2,500 in a segregated fund contract with a 75%/100% guarantee structure. The market value of the contract peaked at $4,500 but then fell. Now, at maturity, the units are worth $2,250.
How much can Yamina expect to receive?)
- A. $2,250
- B. $3,375
- C. $2,500
- D. $1,875
Answer: C
Explanation:
With a75% maturity guarantee, Yamina is guaranteed to receive at least75% of the original investmentat maturity, regardless of market performance.
75% × $2,500 =$1,875, but because there is aresetpossibility if applicable and a100% death benefit guarantee, and if there had been any resets (not mentioned here), she would get the original amount$2,500 based on the basic guarantee.
Exact Extract:
"At maturity, if the market value is less than the guaranteed amount (typically 75% or 100% of the deposited amount), the maturity guarantee is paid." (Reference:Segfunds-E313-2020-12-7ED, Chapter 2.1.1 Guarantees#33:4†Segfunds-E313-2020-12-7ED.
pdf**)
NEW QUESTION # 153
Kevin owns a construction business and wants to take out accident and sickness insurance to protect his income in the event of disability. On his application form, he indicated that he had competed in motocross races over the past five years. What requirements does Kevin need to comply with before the insurer can issue the policy?
- A. Kevin needs to complete a special questionnaire as well as specify how often he engages or intends to engage in the sporting activity in the future; thus, an exclusion rider may be required by the insurer.
- B. Kevin needs to complete a special questionnaire, as well as specify how often he engages or intends to engage in the sporting activity in the future.
- C. Kevin only needs to answer the medical questions.
- D. Kevin only needs to specify how often he engages in the sporting activity.
Answer: A
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:
Motocross is high-risk, requiring a detailed questionnaire and frequency disclosure. Insurers may impose an exclusion rider (Chapter 7:Insurance Recommendation, Contract, and Service Needs).
Option A: Incorrect; misses activity risk.
Option B: Incomplete; lacks detail.
Option C: Incomplete; misses exclusion possibility.
Option D: Correct; full process with potential rider.
Reference: LLQP Accident and Sickness Insurance Manual, Chapter 7:Insurance Recommendation, Contract, and Service Needs.
NEW QUESTION # 154
Luisa owns a balanced segregated fund currently valued at $50,000. Her mother Linda is the current revocable beneficiary of the policy. However, Luisa has been dating Benjamin for a year and would like to name him as the new beneficiary of her policy.
Which of the following statements about modifying the beneficiary designation is CORRECT?
- A. Luisa can modify the designation anytime.
- B. The change will take effect on the date that the insurer receives the change of beneficiary form.
- C. Luisa can call the insurer's head office to notify them of the change.
- D. Since Linda is Luisa's named beneficiary, she would need to consent to the change.
Answer: B
Explanation:
Beneficiary changes in insurance contracts generally become effective once the insurer receives and processes the signed change form. This is supported by LLQP material, which specifies that changes to beneficiary designations must be documented and received by the insurer for the new designation to take effect. Since Linda is a revocable beneficiary, Luisa can make this change without requiring Linda's consent.
Option B is incorrect as revocable beneficiaries do not require consent for changes. Option C is too general, and D is incorrect because a formal written change form is typically required.
NEW QUESTION # 155
Mathilde, aged 65, is seriously ill-though still mentally competent. She has therefore granted her son Jim power of attorney for property so that he will help manage her investments. She has contacted her life insurance agent, asking him to gather all the information needed to:
* Transfer money from her balanced segregated fund into an income fund, and
* Convert her RRIF into a life annuity.Some signatures are required to complete the transactions.
With his power of attorney, what can Jim do if he goes to the agent's office by himself?
- A. By providing a signature, Jim can authorize the two transactions requested by Mathilde.
- B. By providing a signature, Jim can authorize the fund transfer, but Mathilde herself will need to sign the documents for the RRIF conversion.
- C. Nothing. Mathilde herself will need to sign both requests, since she is still mentally competent.
- D. By providing a signature, Jim can authorize the RRIF conversion, but Mathilde herself will need to sign the documents for the fund transfer.
Answer: C
Explanation:
Under the LLQP Ethics, Legal Framework, and Segregated Funds curriculum, it is critical to understand the scope and limitations of a power of attorney (PoA). A power of attorney for property allows an appointed individual to act only when the grantor is incapable of managing their own financial affairs, unless the document explicitly states otherwise and jurisdictional rules permit broader authority. In LLQP exam context, the guiding principle is that a mentally competent individual retains full decision-making authority, regardless of illness or physical condition.
In this scenario, Mathilde is explicitly described as still mentally competent. This is the decisive factor. As long as Mathilde has mental capacity, she remains legally entitled-and required-to authorize changes to her financial products personally. Even though Jim holds a power of attorney for property, that authority is not activated while Mathilde is capable of making her own decisions. The LLQP study materials emphasize that a power of attorney does not override the autonomy of a competent individual.
Both transactions mentioned-switching funds within a segregated fund contract and converting a RRIF into a life annuity-are material financial decisions that require the contract owner's informed consent and signature. Since Mathilde is alive, mentally competent, and the owner of both contracts, she must sign all documents herself. Jim cannot legally substitute his signature in her place at this time.
Options A, B, and C are therefore incorrect because they incorrectly assume that Jim can act on Mathilde's behalf while she remains competent. The LLQP curriculum clearly distinguishes between assisting someone informally and legally authorizing transactions on their behalf.
Accordingly, the correct LLQP-compliant answer is Option D: Jim cannot authorize either transaction, and Mathilde must sign both requests herself while she is mentally competent.
NEW QUESTION # 156
Davy, who just turned 55, intends to retire 10 years from now. Together with his life insurance agent, he determines that he will need to have approximately $200,000 in RRSPs when he reaches age 65 in order to retire comfortably. He feels confident that his current RRSP account can generate a return of 3% per year on average for the next 10 years. However, he does not plan to contribute any new funds to his RRSP because he wants to start saving in his TFSA account instead. He therefore wonders whether his RRSP account currently has sufficient funds for him to meet his retirement goal in 10 years.
What is the minimum RRSP account balance needed now for Davy to meet his goal? (Round to the nearest dollar.)
- A. $140,000
- B. $148,819
- C. $153,846
- D. $150,000
Answer: B
Explanation:
This question is a direct application of the time value of money concept-specifically present value (PV)-as taught in the LLQP Segregated Funds and Annuities material. Present value "works backwards from a future date" and answers the question: how much is needed now to achieve a future savings goal. The LLQP text provides the formula:
PV = FV ÷ (1 + interest rate)#
Here, Davy's future goal is FV = $200,000, the annual return is 3% (0.03), and the time horizon is n = 10 years. Substituting into the LLQP formula:
PV = 200,000 ÷ (1.03)¹#
(1.03)¹# # 1.343916, so:
PV # 200,000 ÷ 1.343916 # $148,818.9, which rounds to $148,819.
Therefore, if Davy has at least $148,819 in his RRSP today and earns an average of 3% per year for the next
10 years with no additional contributions, he should reach approximately $200,000 by age 65.
This aligns exactly with the LLQP explanation that PV calculations are used "to help a person determine how much needs to be saved today to yield a specified pension at a future date."
NEW QUESTION # 157
Insurance of persons representative Veronique is meeting clients referred by an acquaintance for the first time.
Observing some suspicious behaviours on their part, Veronique is thinking about reporting the transaction to the Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC). Which behaviours are signs of suspicious transactions?
- A. The clients seem interested in knowing the long-term benefits of the transaction, which is simple, and the amounts involved seem very high given their apparent financial situation
- B. The clients ask a lot of questions about internal controls and the amounts involved seem very high given their apparent financial situation
- C. The clients are in a hurry, do not seem interested in knowing the long-term benefits of the transaction, and want to pay the amount due in cash
- D. The clients are in a hurry, the planned transaction is fairly simple, and they want to pay the amount due in cash
Answer: C
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation: Under the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act (PCMLTFA), insurance representatives must report suspicious transactions to FINTRAC (Section 7). FINTRAC guidelines list red flags: urgency without justification, disinterest in product details, and cash payments, especially if inconsistent with client profile. Option C-clients in a hurry, uninterested in long-term benefits, and insisting on cash-matches these indicators, suggesting potential money laundering. Option A (questions about controls) may indicate curiosity or caution, not necessarily suspicion. Option B (hurry and cash) is less conclusive without disinterest in benefits. Option D (interest in benefits) contradicts typical laundering behavior. The Ethics manual requires vigilance against financial crime, supporting Veronique's duty to report option C.
References: PCMLTFA, Section 7; FINTRAC Guidelines; Ethics and Professional Practice (Civil Law) Manual, Section on Anti-Money Laundering.
NEW QUESTION # 158
(Ten years ago, Yamina invested $2,500 in a segregated fund contract with a 75%/100% guarantee structure. The market value of the contract peaked at $4,500 but then fell. Now, at maturity, the units are worth $2,250.
How much can Yamina expect to receive?)
- A. $2,250
- B. $3,375
- C. $2,500
- D. $1,875
Answer: C
Explanation:
With a75% maturity guarantee, Yamina is guaranteed to receive at least75% of the original investmentat maturity, regardless of market performance.
75% × $2,500 =$1,875, but because there is aresetpossibility if applicable and a100% death benefit guarantee, and if there had been any resets (not mentioned here), she would get the original amount$2,500 based on the basic guarantee.
Exact Extract:
"At maturity, if the market value is less than the guaranteed amount (typically 75% or 100% of the deposited amount), the maturity guarantee is paid." (Reference:Segfunds-E313-2020-12-7ED, Chapter 2.1.1 Guarantees#33:4 Segfunds-E313-2020-12-7ED.
pdf**)
NEW QUESTION # 159
The company Xtra is growing. Mr. Trenet, chair of the executive committee, invites his financial security advisor, Noah, to meet with them to underwrite an annuity contract. The treasurer of Xtra offers to invest
$2,500,000 of the company's retained earnings. Before voting on a resolution to designate a policyholder, the treasurer asks Noah if Xtra can be designated as the policyholder instead of Mr. Trenet. What answer should Noah give?
- A. Only an individual can be a policyholder; therefore, Noah can recommend that Mr. Trenet be the policyholder
- B. For Xtra to become the subscriber of the contract, the investment amount must come from aregistered plan, such as a retirement fund
- C. Because Xtra is a legal person, Xtra can be the policyholder; Mr. Trenet must be the subrogated annuitant to approve decisions on behalf of Xtra
- D. If the capital is not registered, Xtra can be the policyholder
Answer: D
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation: Under the Civil Code of Quebec (Article 2415), a policyholder (or subscriber) is the entity that owns and pays for an insurance or annuity contract, which can be an individual or a legal person like a corporation. Xtra, as a company, can use its retained earnings (unregistered capital) to fund an annuity contract and be designated as the policyholder, making option D correct. Option A is false, as legal persons can own contracts (e.g., group insurance). Option B's requirement of a registered plan is incorrect-annuities can be funded with non-registered funds. Option C introduces a
"subrogated annuitant," a misnomer here, as the annuitant is the person receiving payments, not a decision- maker, and no such requirement exists. The LLQP and Ethics manual confirm that corporations can be policyholders for business purposes, like key person coverage or investments.
References: Civil Code of Quebec, Article 2415; LLQP Module on Annuities; Ethics and Professional Practice (Civil Law) Manual, Section on Contract Ownership.
NEW QUESTION # 160
Sebastian is a 44-year-old sales representative employed at Premier Aqua. He wants to take a year off to travel and relax. He has worked for the company for 25 years and accumulated $230,000 in a deferred profit sharing plan (DPSP). He would like to know if he can use some of the funds in his DPSP to fund his sabbatical.
- A. Yes, he can withdraw the funds if he wants to.
- B. Yes, he can withdraw the funds if he gets permission from his employer.
- C. No, the funds can only be transferred to a locked-in retirement account (LIRA).
- D. No, the funds can only be transferred to a life income fund (LIF).
Answer: C
Explanation:
As with most Deferred Profit Sharing Plan (DPSP) funds, Sebastian's accumulated balance is generally locked-in, which means it cannot be withdrawn in cash while still under the plan. Instead, he may transfer it to a Locked-In Retirement Account (LIRA) upon leaving his employment or retiring, ensuring the funds remain tax-deferred. LLQP guidelines state that DPSP funds are generally subject to locking-in provisions, which restrict withdrawals and are specifically aimed at providing retirement income.
Thus, contrary to options A and B, Sebastian cannot withdraw the DPSP funds for discretionary purposes, such as funding his sabbatical, because of these restrictions. Option C is incorrect, as transferring to a Life Income Fund (LIF) would only be appropriate once the funds are in a LIRA, typically when Sebastian is closer to retirement age and ready to begin income withdrawals.
NEW QUESTION # 161
Agatha and Peter run a successful sole proprietorship. They are 68 and 70 respectively. Peter has a huge registered investment portfolio that will result in significant tax consequences upon his death. When both of them have passed away they would like their registered investment portfolio to go to their son, Alexander, who is 48 years old. The family would like to purchase life insurance to offset the tax liability.
Which of the following plans would best suit the family?
- A. Two separate permanent single life policies with Agatha and Peter as the insured
- B. A joint first-to-die plan with Agatha and Peter as the insured
- C. A joint first-to-die plan with Peter and Alexander as the insured
- D. A joint last-to-die plan with Agatha and Peter as the insured
Answer: D
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:
Joint last-to-die insurance pays out on the death of the second insured, which is ideal for estate planning needs such as covering taxes on registered assets that arise after both owners pass away. The LLQP study material confirms this structure as most suitable for deferring and covering tax liabilities post-second death.
Reference: Insurance Study Guides Chinese.pdf, Estate Planning with Joint Last-to-Die Insurance
NEW QUESTION # 162
After meeting with his advisor Monica, Tom agrees to apply for a $50,000 whole life insurance policy.
Monica tells him that the monthly premium will be $40 per month. Monica is advised by underwriting that Tom qualifies for an additional $10,000 critical illness rider, and that the new premium would be $50 per month. Monica advises underwriting that Tom accepts the additional coverage without speaking with him first, because it is such a good deal and great coverage, he won't mind. When Tom finds out what she has accepted on his behalf, without his knowledge, he is upset and wants to lodge a complaint to someone other than the insurance company and Monica; he wants to speak with an independent third party. He finds the contact information for the local regulatory authority. What are some of the responsibilities the regulatory authority has in protecting clients like Tom?
- A. Taking action against breaches of conduct, increasing the public's financial knowledge (such as understanding financial concepts), and closing insurance offices that are non-compliant.
- B. Promoting transparency, taking action against breaches of conduct, and giving clients avenues to resolve individual complaints (e.g., OmbudService for Life and Health Insurance).
- C. Promoting transparency, educating the public, and organizing class action lawsuits against insurers.
- D. Promoting transparency, reimbursing financial losses suffered by clients, and giving clients avenues to resolve individual complaints.
Answer: B
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth Explanation with Exact Extract from Documents and Guides:
TheIFSE Ethics and Professional Practice Course (Common Law)outlines that provincial/territorial regulatory authorities oversee insurance agents and protect consumers by promoting transparency, enforcing ethical conduct, and facilitating dispute resolution. Monica's actions (accepting coverage without consent) breach client autonomy and disclosure rules. Regulatory authorities investigate such conduct and refer clients to independent bodies like the OmbudService for Life and Health Insurance for complaints. They don't reimburse losses (B), organize lawsuits (C), or focus solely on public education and office closures (D).
Option A aligns with their role, making it correct.
References:
IFSE Ethics and Professional Practice Course (Common Law), Module 4: Regulatory Environment, Section on "Role of Regulatory Authorities."
NEW QUESTION # 163
Rowan works for a construction company that employs 40 employees. The company is newly established, and the owners have yet to implement a group insurance policy. Rowan falls off the side of a building and breaks his collar bone. The doctor informs him that he will be unable to work for five months.
Who will pay him disability benefits while he is recuperating?
- A. Employment Insurance.
- B. His employer.
- C. Canada Pension Plan.
- D. Workers' Compensation.
Answer: D
Explanation:
In this scenario, Rowan, an employee of a construction company, suffers an injury while on the job. Since the injury occurred in the workplace, he would be eligible for benefits under Workers' Compensation. Workers' Compensation is designed to cover employees who suffer work-related injuries or illnesses, providing them with benefits that include coverage for medical expenses and income replacement during their period of disability.
As the accident happened while Rowan was performing work duties, Workers' Compensation will likely cover his wage loss for the duration he is unable to work due to the injury. Employment Insurance (EI) would not be applicable here, as EI sickness benefits are intended for non-work-related illnesses or injuries. The Canada Pension Plan (CPP) also would not apply, as it provideslong-term disability benefits primarily for severe and prolonged disabilities that prevent individuals from working in any capacity. Therefore, option D is the correct answer, as Workers' Compensation is specifically designed for cases like Rowan's.
NEW QUESTION # 164
......
IFSE Institute LLQP Exam Syllabus Topics:
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
| Topic 4 |
|
Try Best LLQP Exam Questions from Training Expert Prep4away: https://certblaster.prep4away.com/IFSE-Institute-certification/braindumps.LLQP.ete.file.html